Both are real businesses you can look up. One drives RouteMate entirely from its own software over the API; the other runs three technicians and a diary’s worth of jobs from the dispatch board. Neither page claims a saving we have not measured.
Four companies, one in-house system, and installers whose day arrives already sequenced — with a time allowance per job type so a two-hour fascia install is not treated like a corflute swap.
Springfield and Ipswich since 1999. Cleans that run from forty minutes to half a day, vacate work tied to a handover time, and a day divided by hours available rather than by suburb.
| Attribute | Gigil | Nu-Look |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Design, print and signage | Carpet and upholstery cleaning |
| Plan | Enterprise | Team |
| How work arrives | POST from their own platform | Entered on the dispatch board |
| Who plans the day | Nobody — the API does | One person, in minutes |
| Time on site | Set by job type in their system | Set per booking by service |
| The deadline that binds | Install windows on site access | Vacate handovers |
Different plans, opposite entry points, the same underlying decision: sequence the work with time on site inside the calculation.
Reference calls are available during a trial. We will ask them first, and we will not pretend a courier reference is a field-service one.